Vieira Netto L A, Araújo Peres L F, Matos Pereira N, Jardim Zaccariotti A, Arruda Zaccariotti V, Silva Marques R A, et al . Outcomes of Surgical Decompression for Spinal Metastases From Gynecological Cancers: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Iran J Neurosurg 2021; 7 (1) :37-48
URL:
http://irjns.org/article-1-250-en.html
1- Faculty of Medicine, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Brazil.
2- Department of Neurological Surgery, Clinics Hospital of the Faculty of Medicine, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Brazil.
3- Department of Neurological Surgery, Clinics Hospital of the Faculty of Medicine, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Brazil. , drigocavalcante@yahoo.com.br
Abstract: (2798 Views)
Background and Aim: Gynecological cancer is one of the most common types of cancer worldwide. Nonetheless, spinal metastasis from gynecological cancer is scarcely reported in the literature. In cases of spinal cord compression, the standard treatment is a decompressive surgery followed by radiotherapy treatment for selected patients. This study aimed to report the overall survival and surgical results in patients presenting with gynecological spinal metastases who underwent spinal cord/nerve root decompression and stabilization.
Methods and Materials/Patients: A total of 18 patients were included in this study. The surgical procedures were performed from 2012 to 2019. The evaluation of neurological status, spinal stability, and pain were performed using the American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (ASIA), Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS), and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), respectively.
Results: The lumbar spine was the most affected location (n=30; 50.0%). Regarding the preoperative neurological deficits, 16 cases (n=16; 88.9%) presented ASIA graded A–D before the surgery, being reduced to five (n=5; 27.8%) after the procedures. The pain level means (pre-and postoperative) were 9.39±0.79 and 2.28±1.44. The overall median survival was 6.1 months (95% Confidence Interval [CI] of 1.10–11.13 months). The mean survival of ambulatory and non-ambulatory patients before the surgery was 7.36 months and 3.2 months, respectively (P=0.007 – Log-rank Mantel–Cox).
Conclusion: Decompressive surgery and stabilization promote mechanical pain relief, spinal stability, an improvement of neurological function, and indirectly improving quality of life, despite a dismal overall survival of patients who present with metastatic spinal compression disease.
Full Text [PDF 1674 kb]
(750 Downloads)
| |
Full Text (HTML) (901 Views)
• Eighteen patients with spinal metastases from gynecological cancer were included in the study.
• Mechanical pain relief, spinal stability, and improvement of neurological function were observed.
• There was a positive correlation between pre-operative ambulatory status and overall survival.
Plain Language Summary
Gynecological cancer has a high incidence worldwide. Eventually this type of cancer can progress with metastases, such as spinal metastases. However, spinal metastasis from gynecological cancer is rarely reported, which shows the importance of studies about this condition. Herein, the authors analyzed the prognostic factors related to this pathology, such as global survival and surgical results. The authors performed a literature review and an analysis of 18 medical records of patients submitted to decompressive surgery plus radiotherapy in the Department of Neuro-Oncology at a cancer hospital in Brazil. The evaluation of preoperative and postoperative condition was performed using specific scores and scales. In relation to the patients’ characteristics, the most common type of cancer was cervical cancer (n=12, 66.6%) and the vertebral regions most affected by metastases were lumbar (n=30; 50.0%). Even though decompressive surgery promotes pain relief and improvement in the quality of life for patients with spinal metastasis from gynecological cancer, the prognosis is poor, with low survival rate. The disease affects, mainly, patients of advanced age. Therefore, the decision-making process to select appropriate patients for the surgical procedure treatment must measure the possibility of positive outcomes.
Type of Study:
Research |
Subject:
Spine